Karisma Kapoor Kids vs Stepmother Priya Kapur: Delhi HC Rebukes ‘Melodramatic’ Fee Dispute in Will Forgery Case



The Delhi High Court on Friday pulled up both sides in the inheritance dispute involving Karisma Kapoor’s children and their stepmother Priya Sachdev Kapur, after a dispute was raised over unpaid university fees of Karisma’s daughter studying in the US.


Senior Advocate Mahesh Jethmalani, appearing for the children, claimed that their father Sunjay Kapur was obligated under the matrimonial decree to fund their education, but the fees had allegedly not been paid for two months. He said the children’s estate was with Priya Kapur and she was responsible.


Senior Advocate Rajiv Nayar, representing Priya Kapur, denied the allegation, insisting that all expenses were fully taken care of and accusing the plaintiffs of raising the issue only to generate media coverage.


Justice Neena Bansal Krishna expressed strong displeasure, stating that such personal issues should not reach the court.


“I don't want to spend more than 30 seconds on this… I don’t want this hearing to be melodramatic,” the judge said, directing Senior Advocate Shyel Trehan to ensure such matters are resolved privately.


The Court was hearing arguments on the interim injunction sought by Karisma’s children to restrain Priya Kapur from alienating Sunjay Kapur’s assets. In the main suit, the siblings accuse Priya—Sunjay’s third wife—of forging his will to take control of his estate. The disputed will, dated March 21, 2025, purportedly leaves Sunjay’s entire personal estate to Priya Sachdev Kapur.


Opposing the injunction, Nayar maintained that the will was genuine, duly executed, attested by two witnesses, and even shared in the family WhatsApp group.


The High Court will continue hearing the matter on November 19, aiming to conclude arguments on the interim application swiftly.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Barabanki Shocker | Two Friends Swap Wives, Court Marriage & Police Action

Image
  Barabanki (UP) – A bizarre case from Lonikatra police station area has left locals stunned. Two friends, Anup and Pappu, working in the same private company in Ahmedabad, allegedly exchanged wives. The matter escalated to the extent of court marriage. Pappu alleged that Anup kept his wife Savita with him for the past four months and pressured him to marry Anup’s wife. He even claims he was given ₹10,000 for this arrangement. Anup later performed a court marriage with Pappu’s wife. Meanwhile, Anup’s wife accused him of domestic violence and said she was forced to live with Pappu. She alleged she was told, “Now you two should live together like husband and wife.” Police confirmed both sides failed to reach a compromise. Anup Yadav and Pappu were detained and challaned under Section 151.
Read more

Chittoor Tragedy: 19-Year-Old Ends Life After Parents Oppose Instagram Relationship

Image
In Patrapalli village of V. Kot mandal, Chittoor district, a 19-year-old woman, Shobha, reportedly took her own life after her parents opposed her relationship with a man she had met on Instagram. According to reports, Shobha had expressed her wish to marry him, but her parents tried to dissuade her. On Tuesday, following another heated argument with them, she allegedly hanged herself from a ceiling fan at her home, leading to her death. * * * Disclaimer: If you or someone you know is struggling with suicidal thoughts, please know that you're not alone and help is available. Talking to someone can make a difference. suicide Prevention Helpline (available 24x7): iCall — 9152987821 AASRA — 91-9820466726 Vandrevala Foundation — 1860 266 2345 or 9999 666 555 These helplines offer free, confidential support. Please reach out. Your life matters.
Read more

Agra Woman Threatens Suicide, Levels Allegations Against Police – Officials Call Claims False

Image
  Agra: A serious dispute has emerged between a local woman and Trans Yamuna Police. The complainant, Sarju Yadav of Kalindi Vihar, alleged that police ignored a theft case at her house and behaved indecently with her. She claimed that if justice is not delivered, she may take her own life, holding the station staff and Inspector-in-Charge responsible. She also accused suspended inspector Rajkumar Goswami, earlier linked to her case, of misconduct. Police, however, have given a different version. On 19 August 2025, when Sarju Yadav visited the station to inquire about her case (Crime No. 370/24), officials informed her that the matter had been closed in January. According to police, she then began videography inside the station, and when stopped, allegedly abused and misbehaved with the lady sub-inspector at the women’s help desk. Officials said that despite repeated persuasion, she continued creating disturbance, attempted self-harm, and was challaned under Sections 126/135/170 BN...
Read more